| 000 | 01198cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64473 | ||
| 008 | 010926n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u114850 | ||
| 100 | _aLindsey, S. | ||
| 245 | _aContractual uncertainty | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aArchitects' Journal _v214(9) 13 September 2001, 52(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "American Design Associates v Donald Insall Associates", which illustrates the potential problems with letters of intent and their contractual effect. Demonstrates some of the risks involved in relying on standard forms without fully considering their applicability, and the importance of agreeing dispute resolution arrangements. Among the lessons to be learnt are that letters of intent should be treated with caution, as they often do not create the binding agreement you assume. In addition, if a standard form does not fit the particular circumstances, it may not provide the protection one anticipates. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aAMERICAN DESIGN ASSOCIATES V DONALD INSALL ASSOCIATES | ||
| 650 | _aLETTERS OF INTENT | ||
| 650 |
_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236 |
||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68380 _d68380 |
||