| 000 | 00939cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3736-28 | ||
| 008 | 010926n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u114854 | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA tale of two agents | |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0138) 22 September 2001, 189(1) |
||
| 520 | _aA recent case, "H R L Property Management Services Ltd v Chequers of Kensington Ltd", involved a dispute over agents' fees where the court ruled in favour of the second agent. The issue raised is not who was first but who was the effective cause in selling the property. The implication is that being first may raise an inference but it is not conclusive. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aH R L PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD V CHEQUERS OF KENSINGTON LTD | ||
| 650 | _aESTATE AGENTS' COMMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aEFFECTIVE CAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY SALES | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-AGENCY-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68384 _d68384 |
||