| 000 | 01336cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS54491 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u10765 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aYorkshire RHA v Fairclough Building Ltd and another | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aAll England Law Reports _v(1996) 1 All ER, 519-531(9) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 1 November 1995. The court below had allowed Y`s application to join the NHS trust who had taken over buildings it had had constructed by F, in order to carry on proceedings against F and T (a firm of architects) for defects (ABS51698). T appealed, contending that RSC Order 15 - under which Y`s application was granted - did not apply, since the Limitation Act 1980 provided no `new claim` (defined to include substitution of a new party) could be made in the course of proceedings after the expiry of the limitation period. Appeal dismissed - substitution of the trust for the plaintiff was not a `new claim` under s35 of the 1980 Act, therefore expiry of limitation period need not be considered. | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION ACT 1980 | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION PERIOD | ||
| 650 | _aRSC ORDER 15 | ||
| 650 | _aYORKSHIRE RHA V FAIRCLOUGH BUILDING LTD AND ANOTHER | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c6844 _d6844 |
||