000			01576cam a2200313 4500
001			ABS64560
008			011003n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u114966
100			_aWilkinson, H. W.
245			_aVoidness for uncertainty in obligations
260			_c2001
490			_aNew Law Journal _v151(7000) 21 September 2001, 1369-1370(2)
520			_aDiscusses case law that has arisen from, and dealt with the interpretation of, vague phrases contained in contracts. These include "Hackney LBC v Thompson", in which the meaning of the phrase: 'the due proportion of the reasonably estimated amount required to cover the costs and expenses incurred..' was considered. Also considers case law that has involved the interpretation of vagueness in rent reviews and options to renew, such as the phrase: 'a rent to be agreed'. Advises parties not to provide in their contracts for something to be agreed in the future, and to expressly state the course of action that will be taken if agreement is not reached.
590			_aABS
650			_aContracts _96232
650			_aTERMS
650			_aVOID FOR UNCERTAINTY
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aHACKNEY LBC V THOMPSON
650			_aBROWN V GOULD
650			_aSHEFFIELD CC V JACKSON AND OTHERS
650			_aCORSON V RHUDDLAN BC
650			_aBEER V BOWDEN
650			_aHILLAS & CO LTD V ARCOS LTD
650			_aFOLEY V CLASSIQUE COACHES LTD
650			_aSCOTTISH WHOLEFOODS COLLECTIVE WAREHOUSE V RAYE INSTRUMENTS
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT
942			_n0
999			_c68454 _d68454