000			01448cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS64541
008			011005n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115009
100			_aLoveland, I.
245			_aAnd now wash your hands
260			_c2001
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vOctober 2001, 1144-1152(9)
520			_aDiscusses the implications of "Birmingham CC v Oakley" HL 2000, which found that a risk which arose by reason of an undesirable arrangement of rooms (i.e. a lavatory without a wash basin) could not be classed as a statutory nuisance. Considers the substantive issue before HL , and the majority and dissenting judgments, and the likely impact of the Human Rights Act. Notes that HL's judgment highlights the difficulties posed for both local authorities qua landlords and their tenants by the ongoing residualisation of public sector housing stock. Full copy of judgeent available on http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd001129/birmin-1.htm
590			_aABS
650			_aBIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL V OAKLEY
650			_aENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990 S79
650			_aSTATUTORY NUISANCE
650			_aPUBLIC SECTOR HOUSING
650			_aPUBLIC HEALTH
650			_aHOUSING
690			_aHealth and safety _96244
856			_uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd001129/birmin-1.htm
942			_n0
999			_c68490 _d68490