000			01205cam a2200205 4500
001			ABS64470
008			011005n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115019
245			_aJames Moore Earthmoving v Miller Construction Ltd
260			_c2001
490			_aBuilding Law Reports _v [2001] BLR 322-324(3)
520			_aCA 6 April 2001. A entered into a sub-contract with B to carry out earthmoving works. B was employed by the Department of the Environment under a main contract. Disputes arose between A and B over payments A claimed to be entitled to. Following an arbitration hearing B applied to have the award set aside, and the arbitrator removed for misconduct. A appealed. The appeal was allowed. "Held": It was not appropriate to make a finding of misconduct without giving the arbitrator notice of the grounds for such action. Prejudice to a party would rarely be a relevant consideration with regard to whether an arbitrator should be removed.
590			_aABS
650			_aJAMES MOORE EARTHMOVING V MILLER CONSTRUCTION LTD
650			_aARBITRATORS
650			_aMISCONDUCT
650			_aPREJUDICE
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c68499 _d68499