000			01676cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS64697
008			011016n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115136
245			_aUratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins and Carrell
260			_c2001
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2001] 3 WLR 806-823(18)
520			_aHL 11 October 2001. Concerned with whether a single room in a hotel with no cooking facilities constituted a dwelling under the terms of the Housing Act 1988 s1(1).The first defendant Collins (X) appealed against the CA decision allowing the claimant U's appeal against the HC ruling that both X and second defendant Carrell (Y) were assured tenants of their rooms. The HL held that the presence or absence of cooking facilities was irrelevant to the issue of exclusive occupation. On the grounds that a single room was capable of being regarded as a 'separate dwelling' in accordance with the Housing Act 1988 1(1) it was held that the X and Y's occupation of their rooms were as assured tenants and not by way of a licence. Appeal allowed. CA decision reversed. Copy of HL judgement available on http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011011/uratem-1.htm.
590			_aABS
650			_aURATEMP VENTURES LTD V COLLINS AND CARRELL
650			_aDWELLING HOUSE
650			_aHOTEL ROOM
650			_aASSURED TENANCIES
650			_aLICENCES
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1988
650			_aEXCLUSIVE OCCUPATION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
856			_uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011011/uratem-1.htm
942			_n0
999			_c68572 _d68572