| 000 | 01077cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3012-27 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u10785 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent review | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1994) EGCS 44(1) (19/3/94) |
||
| 520 | _a"Arnold and others v National Westminster Bank plc" CA 9 March 1994. Tenants` appeal dismissed, CA upheld a judgment that their original application to challenge a rent review decision based on an error of law, was excessively delayed and could not call upon any special provision for remission. | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1950 S22 | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1979 | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATORS' AWARDS | ||
| 650 | _aNATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC V ARTHUR YOUNG MCCLELLAND MOORES | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c6858 _d6858 |
||