000			01094cam a2200217 4500
001			WB3739-26
008			011017n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115166
245			_aOne contract, or two?
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0141) 13 October 2001, 181(1)
520			_aExamines the case "Grossman v Hooper", where the parties had shared the repayment of a mortgage for a house. On the break-up of the relationship, a contract was agreed, giving the claimant (G) ownership but the defendant (H) alleged that, as part of the agreement, G would repay an outstanding loan. However, it was held that a written contract for a sale of land must contain all terms agreed by the parties; a court will not readily interpret a 'missing' term as part of a separate contract.
590			_aWB
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989 S2
650			_aSALE OF LAND
650			_aGROSSMAN V HOOPER
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S40
650			_aContracts _96232
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-RESIDENTIAL
942			_n0
999			_c68587 _d68587