000			01279cam a2200253 4500
001			WB3739-23
008			011017n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115168
245			_aTown and country planning
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 41 EG 185 (CS) (13/10/01)
520			_a"Joinglobal Ltd v SoS Environment, Transport and the Regions and another", QBD 3 October 2001, dealt with issues raised by a proposed residential development. Using the guidance in PPG3 and the sequential test for identifying development sites the inspector held that the site was greenfield and should not be built on. The claimant (J) claimed the land should have been considered as urban land and as previously developed. It was held that the inspector was correct to consider the land as not previously developed and that, even in villages, the reuse of land should be considered before greenfield sites.
590			_aWB
650			_aHOUSING DEVELOPMENT
650			_aPPG3
650			_aPLANNING GUIDANCE
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288
650			_aSEQUENTIAL TEST
650			_aGREENFIELD SITES
650			_aVILLAGES
650			_aPREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED LAND
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
942			_n0
999			_c68589 _d68589