000			01267cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS64707
008			011019n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115218
100			_aBingham, Tony
245			_aIndependence daze
260			_c2001
490			_aBuilding _v266(805) 12 October 2001, 52(2)
520			_aMentions the balance arbitrators have to take between their duty not be swayed by outside pressure and their fear of being thrown out by the High Court during the course of an arbitration. Argues that it is difficult fo the arbitrator to square both of these roles. They will often adjust their decision in order to avoid criticism. Gives examples from recent cases including Balfour Beatty vs Kelston Sparkes where Balfour attacked on ground of misconduct by characterising the decision of the arbitrator as 'failing in fairness'. and "Miller Construction v James Moore". Concludes by attacking the policy of 20 years ago which disallowed except on exceptional grounds appeal on arbitrator's errors.
590			_aABS
650			_aARBITRATORS
650			_aETHICAL CONDUCT
650			_aMILLER CONSTRUCTION VS JAMES MOORE
650			_aBALFOUR BEATTY CONSTRUCTION V KELSTON SPARKES CONTRACTORS
690			_aLAW-UK
942			_n0
999			_c68620 _d68620