| 000 | 00915cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3740-20 | ||
| 008 | 011023n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u115246 | ||
| 245 | _aReasons to be punctual | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0142) 20 October 2001, 135(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case "Starmark Enterprises Ltd v CPL Distribution Ltd" (2001) in which the CA attempted to clarify the position relating to the concept of time being of the essence. See WB3731-34. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aSTARMARK ENTERPRISES V CPL DISTRIBUTION | ||
| 650 | _aTIME OF THE ESSENCE | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aHENRY SMITHS CHARITY TRUSTEES V AWADA | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 650 | _aMECCA LEISURE LTD V RENOWN INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aUNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68632 _d68632 |
||