000			01646cam a2200301 4500
001			ABS64694
008			011029n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115364
100			_aElson, J
245		3	_aAn open verdict
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0142) 20 October 2001, 134(1)
520			_aConsiders the implications of the landmark European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgment in "Courage v Crehan" which found that a co-contractor can claim damages for breach of the EC Treaty Article 81. Article 81 disallows agreeements that prevent, restrict or distort competition between members of the EC. Illustrates how the judgment will affect English law with reference to the case "Passmore v Morland plc" and argues that the lack of clear ECJ guidelines means that certain issues will be contested. Concludes that the decision in "Crehan" is also likely to be applied to claims under the Competition Act 1998. Full copy of "Courage v Crehan" available on http://curia.eu.int/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?lang=en&num=79989079C19990453&doc=T&ouvert=T&seance=ARRET&where=().
590			_aABS
650			_aEC TREATY ARTICLE 81
650			_aEUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
650			_aCOURAGE V CREHAN
650			_aTINSLEY V MILLIGAN
650			_aPASSMORE V MORLAND
650			_aCOMPETITION
650			_aBEER TIES
650			_aPUBLIC HOUSES
650			_aCOMPETITION ACT 1998
650			_aDAMAGES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
856			_uhttps://curia.eu.int/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?lang=en&num=79989079C19990453&doc=T&ouvert=T&seance=ARRET&where=()
942			_n0
999			_c68705 _d68705