000			01429cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS64739
008			011101n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115433
100			_aEnglish, R
245			_aFoot-and-mouth in the courts
260			_c2001
490			_aNew Law Journal _v151(7004) 19 October 2001, 1515-1516(2)
520			_aConsiders the implications of "Westerhall Farm v Scottish Ministers", the first legal challenge to foot and mouth slaughter policy in Scotland. "Westerhall Farm" petitioned the notification that all their livestock would be slaughtered on the following grounds: the decision was contrary to Council Directive 85/11/EEC and the European Convention on Human Rights Article 6; the slaughter policy was inflexible and a disproportionate invasion of their property rights; and the procedure used to implement the policy were contrary to Scottish administrative law. It was found that the slaughter policy was justifiable on all counts.
590			_aABS
650			_aFOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE
650			_aWESTERHALL FARM V SCOTTISH MINISTERS
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650			_aEU DIRECTIVE
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS
650			_aSLAUGHTER POLICY
650			_aPROPERTY-RURAL AND NATURAL ASSETS-AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY-LIVESTOCK
650			_aSCOTLAND
690			_aRural _96268
942			_n0
999			_c68747 _d68747