| 000 | 01503cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64625 | ||
| 008 | 011102n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u115451 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aPromises, promises | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8207) 26 October 2001, 54-55(2) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines "Actionstrength v International Glass Engineering InGl En SpA and another" (CA 10 October 2001, X116027) which addressed the validity of oral agreements. An oral agreement had been arranged whereby Saint-Gobain promised Actionstrength it would pay for the work done if its Italian main contractor couldn't pay. The subcontractor carried out £1.3m of work but didn't get paid by Saint-Globain because according to the Statute of Frauds 1677, an oral contract to accept liability for another person's debt or future debt will not be enforced in court. As there was no written contract, Saint-Gobain won the case. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aACTIONSTRENGTH LTD V INTERNATIONAL GLASS ENGINEERING INGL EN SPA AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aSUBCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aORAL AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aSTATUTE OF FRAUDS 1677 | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/8AA4A1CDF19D173A80256AE2003C84ED?OpenDocument _vView judgment on the Court Service website... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68760 _d68760 |
||