000			01463cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS64695
008			011102n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115459
245			_aLuminar Leisure Ltd v Apostole
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v [2001] 42 EG 140-145(6)
520			_aChD 24 May 2001. The claimant (L) held a lease of premises that had been previously operated by the defendant landlord (A) as a nightclub. The premises were subsequently listed as buildings of special interest and L applied to A for consent to underlet and change of use to a fitness centre. Based on the advice and assessment of his valuer (W), A refused consent claiming the change of use and proposed rental value would not compensate him for £300,000 loss of reversionary value. L claimed damages contesting that A had unreasonable withheld consent. A counterclaimed for damages for alleged breaches of covenant by L. L's claim was allowed and A's counterclaim dismissed on the grounds of flawed advice from W. W's method of valuing the business was improper and he had incorrectly dismissed the fitness club as a 'fad' that would not last.
590			_aABS
650			_aUNDERLETTING
650			_aLUMINAR LEISURE LTD V APOSTOLE
650			_aFITNESS CLUB
650			_aCHANGE OF USE
650			_aNIGHTCLUB
650			_aValuation _96273
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c68766 _d68766