000			01930cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS64698
008			011102n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115460
245			_aR(on the application of Daejan Properties Ltd) v London LVT
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v [2001] 43 EG 187-190(4)
520			_aCA 12 July 2001. The appellant landlord (D) owned a block of flats let on long leases where leasees paid service charges. A number of leasees applied to the respondent London LVT under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s19(2A) claiming that service charges had been unreasonable and excessive over a number of years. At a preliminary hearing, the LVT interpreted the phrase 'alleged to be payable' in s19(2A) to refer to charges paid but not agreed as well as to those outstanding. The LVT also found the limitation period of 12 years to be applicable in the case of service charges. D's application for judicial review of the LVT's decision was dismissed. D appealed. Appeal allowed on the grounds that the LVT's jurisdiction is restricted to unpaid service charges and that the Limitation Act 1980 has no application to applications to the LVT under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s19. Full copy of judgement available on http://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/0F587CAFA3EE0EE180256A8B0036A64E?OpenDocument.
590			_aABS
650			_aLIMITATION ACT 1980
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1987
650			_aLEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL
650			_aJURISDICTION
650			_aALLEGED TO BE PAYABLE
650			_aSERVICE CHARGES
650			_aR V LONDON LVT EX P DAEJAN PROPERTIES LTD
650			_aR V LONDON LVT EX P DAEJAN PROPERTIES LTD
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/0F587CAFA3EE0EE180256A8B0036A64E?OpenDocument
942			_n0
999			_c68767 _d68767