| 000 | 01400cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64696 | ||
| 008 | 011102n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u115461 | ||
| 245 | _aSouth v Chamberlayne and others | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[2001] 43 EG 190-194(5) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 7 September 2001. The claimant tenant (S) served a notice upon the respondent landlords to enfranchise under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The LT determined the price payable as £2.395m. S contracted to subsell her interest in the property to E for £4.5m and asked the landlords to transfer directly to E. Shortly after S assigned her statutory rights under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 to E. The landlords decided they were not obliged to transfer the property to S or E because according to the provisions of the assignment, S's statutory right had been extinguished as the right had not been assigned with the tenancy. S issued proceedings claiming specific performance of the landlord's statutory obligation to transfer the property. It was found that S was entitled to specific performance. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aSPECIFIC PERFORMANCE | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY TRANSFER | ||
| 650 | _aSOUTH V CHAMBERLAYNE | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68768 _d68768 |
||