| 000 | 01117cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3742-11 | ||
| 008 | 011107n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u115513 | ||
| 245 | _aDevelopment disagreement | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0144) 3 November 2001, (1) |
||
| 520 | _aSecond part of a discussion of "Liverpool City Council v Walton Group" - a wide-ranging dispute over the development agreement relating to a site in the centre of Liverpool (for part 1 see: WB3741-17). Among the key points drawn from the ruling are that: while a court will not imply a general obligation to co-operate, it can require a contracting party to facilitate specific aspects of a contract. Secondly, in this agreement there was an implied obligation to act reasonably when deciding whether to allow the development agreement to proceed to its next stage. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aLIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL V WALTON GROUP PLC | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 |
_aContracts _96232 |
||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONDITIONS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68800 _d68800 |
||