| 000 | 01006cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3742-26 | ||
| 008 | 011108n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u115539 | ||
| 245 | _aLocal plan | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 45 EG 141 (CS) |
||
| 520 | _a"R (on the application of JA Pye Ltd and others) v Oxford CC" QBD 26 October 2001. The claimant developer (P) sought judicial review of defendant's (O) decision to adopt revised social housing policies in the form of supplementary planning guidance (spg) rather than a statutory review of the local plan. P declared that spg was unlawful and that O was duty bound to proceed by way of local plan. P's claim dismissed. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aR V OXFORD CITY COUNCIL EX P J A PYE (OXFORD) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PROCESS | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSE BUILDING | ||
| 650 | _aSOCIAL HOUSING | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPERS | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68820 _d68820 |
||