| 000 | 01567cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64787 | ||
| 008 | 011122n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u115710 | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G. | ||
| 245 | _aGeoff Brewer of Brewer Consulting considers challenges to adjudication | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v410(6348) 10 October 2001, 33(1) |
||
| 520 | _aCompares how the Scottish and English courts have differed in their interpretation of the "Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996" in a few areas. One area of interpretation is whether, following an application for enforcement of an adjudicator's decision, the court would be willing to enforce part of a decision if it seemed sound, and refuse enforcement of the remaining part if a successful challenge had been made. Looks at the different approaches north and south of the border with reference to case law. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aBAR V LAW MINING | ||
| 650 | _aKNS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES (BIRMINGHAM) V SINDALL | ||
| 650 | _aFAREBROTHER BUILDING SERVICES V FROGMORE INVESTMENTS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS | ||
| 650 | _aJURISDICTION | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68921 _d68921 |
||