000			01796cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS64828
008			011126n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115730
245			_aRodway v Landy
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v 44 EG 151-157(7)
520			_aCA 4 April 2001. In 1994 the claimant (R) and defendant (L) were medical practitioners who acquired a property for use as a surgery in which they set up a medical practice as partners. The partnership was terminated in 1998. R commenced proceedings claiming that the property was a partnership asset and seeking its sale. L denied the property was jointly owned and counterclaimed seeking an order pursuant to the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 s14 for the partitioning of the property. At an earlier hearing it was held that the property was partnership property. Both R and L agreed that they held the property as beneficial tenants in common and equal shares. R appealed the decision of a trial judge that the occupation of the property should be divided between both parties. R argued that s13 of the 1996 Act meant one co-owner could not be excluded from a part of trust property. L cross-appealed in relation to the award of reduced costs made to him. "Held", the appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed.
590			_aABS
650			_aTRUST
650			_aMEDICAL PRACTITIONERS
650			_aREAL PROPERTY
650			_aOCCUPATION RIGHTS
650			_aEXCLUSION
650			_aCOSTS ORDERS
650			_aTRUSTS OF LAND AND APPOINTMENT OF TRUSTEES ACT 1996 S14
650			_aNATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE ACT 1977
650			_aTERMINATION OF PARTNERSHIP
650			_aBENEFICIAL TENANTS IN COMMON
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c68933 _d68933