| 000 | 01370cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64827 | ||
| 008 | 011203n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u115809 | ||
| 100 | _aKnight, S. | ||
| 245 | _aMadness in the method | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0145) 10 November 2001, 136(1) |
||
| 520 | _aThe case of "Lady Manor Ltd v Fat Cat Café Bars Ltd" (West London County Court, Abs64439) has created much interest and also prompted a fresh look at the methods used by agents. The main point arising from the "Fat Cat" case is that agents cannot provide unsolicited information and then demand payment. The article states that agents should make it clear that they want to effect an introduction and that they are acting on behalf of the prospective tenant or purchaser. Suggests a series of steps that should be taken to ensure that each party is clear about the services being provided. Concludes with a look at how many retailers and leisure operators are frustrated by the methods used by introducing agents | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLADY MANOR LTD V FAT CAT CAFE BARS | ||
| 650 | _aINTRODUCTORY FEES | ||
| 650 | _aESTATE AGENTS | ||
| 650 | _aNON-RETAINED AGENTS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMISSIONS | ||
| 650 | _aENTITLEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY TRANSACTIONS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-AGENCY | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68982 _d68982 |
||