000			01619cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS64811
008			011204n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u115850
245			_aAshworth Frazer Ltd v Gloucester CC
260			_c2001
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2001] 1 WLR 2180-2204(24)
520			_aHL 8 November 2001. Appeal by local authority (G) and cross-appeal by tenant (A) against CA decision (See Abs62094) were allowed. In allowing the cross appeal, HL held that the proposed use intended by the assignee would not have been in breach of any covenant contained in the lease. G's appeal was allowed on the grounds that the CA wrongly applied "Killick v Second Covent Garden Property Co Ltd" 1973 with regard to whether a landlord's withholding of consent was reasonable or not. HL ruled that the HC should determine whether G had acted unreasonably in refusing consent to assign. Full copy of judgement available on http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011108/ashwth-1.htm.
590			_aABS
650			_aASHWORTH FRAZER LTD V GLOUCESTER CC
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (USE CLASSES) ORDER 1963
650			_aCOVENANTS
650			_aASSIGNMENT OF LEASES
650			_aWITHHOLDING CONSENT
650			_aCONSENT TO ASSIGN
650			_aREFUSAL
650			_aCOMMERCIAL LEASES
650			_aKILLICK V SECOND COVENT GARDEN PROPERTY CO LTD
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011108/ashwth-1.htm
942			_n0
999			_c69016 _d69016