| 000 | 01125cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64944 | ||
| 008 | 011211n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u115938 | ||
| 100 | _aYule, I | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe pleasure principle | |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8208) 2 November 2001, 64(1) |
||
| 520 | _aArgues that the recent case "Farley v Skinner" is a warning to surveyors and designers that they could be liable if it is proved that a material part of the contract relates to the provision of pleasure. Mr Farley was awarded compensation for suffering physical inconvenience and distress in his retirement home because of aircraft noise which his surveyor claimed was not a problem. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aFARLEY V SKINNER | ||
| 650 | _aRUXLEY ELECTRONICS AND CONSTRUCTION V FORSYTH | ||
| 650 | _aINCONVENIENCE | ||
| 650 | _aAIRCRAFT NOISE | ||
| 650 | _aDISTRESS | ||
| 650 | _aSURVEYORS | ||
| 650 |
_aFACILITIES MANAGEMENT _96240 |
||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69064 _d69064 |
||