| 000 | 01158cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64851 | ||
| 008 | 011212n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u115977 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T | ||
| 245 | _aSynchronise watches | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8207) 23 November 2001, 50-51(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case "Sindall Ltd v Solland" which deals with two key issues. Sindall failed to give contract administrator Michael Edwards & Associates (MEA) enough time to respond to its complaint before starting adjudication which meant the first adjudicator had no right to adjudicate; MEA accused Sindall of not proceeding reasonably and diligently yet failed to give Sindall the correct extension of time which meant MEA had no grounds for giving notice. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aSINDALL LTD V SOLLAND | ||
| 650 |
_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236 |
||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSION OF TIME | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69095 _d69095 |
||