000			01486cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS64856
008			011214n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116005
100			_aBrewer, G
245			_aGeoff Brewer examines pay-when-paid clauses under the DOM/1 form
260			_c2001
490			_aContract Journal _v411(6354) 21 November 2001, 26(1)
520			_aExamines the operation of pay-when-paid clauses under the DOM/1 form of subcontract . Explains DOM/1 Amendment 10 which deals with pay-when-paid provisions and insolvency. Subcontractors objected to cl32 and it should have been removed, but it still remains in the standard form because of a printing error. Illustrates the role of cl32 in the case "Aqua Design and Play International Ltd and Fenlock Hansen v Kier Regional Ltd" (QBD, 22 October 2001). Kier was not allowed to rely on the pay-when-paid provisions of cl32 as these had not been properly incorporated into the subcontracts. View judgment at www.coutservice.gov.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aDOM/1 CL32
650			_aInsolvency _96247
650			_aPAY WHEN PAID
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aSUBCONTRACTS
650			_aAQUA DESIGN AND PLAY INTERNATIONAL LTD AND ANOTHER V KIER REGIONAL LTD
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=818 _vView judgment on the Court Service website...
942			_n0
999			_c69117 _d69117