000			01309cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS64918
008			011214n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116008
100			_aAbbott, S.
245			_aIndecent proposal
260			_c2001
490			_aProperty Week _v66(49) 7 December 2001,40(1)
520			_aDiscusses the case "Ashworth Frazer Ltd v Gloucester CC" (2001) which has reversed the decision in "Killick v Second Covent Garden Property Co Ltd" (1973) regarding the landlords right to withhold consent to an assignment on the basis of the assignee's proposed use of the property. The decision in "Ashworth Frazer Ltd v Gloucester CC" will allow landlords to challenge a tenant's proposed use of property in the courts with a reasonable chance of success, although it does not establish that it will always be reasonable for a landlord to withhold consent on this basis.
590			_aABS
650			_aKILLICK V SECOND COVENT GARDEN PROPERTY CO LTD
650			_aASHWORTH FRAZER LTD V GLOUCESTER CC
650			_aCOMMERCIAL LEASES
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (USE CLASSES) ORDER 1963
650			_aASSIGNMENT OF LEASES
650			_aWITHHOLDING CONSENT
650			_aCONSENT TO ASSIGN
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
999			_c69120 _d69120