000			01061cam a2200193 4500
008			011218n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116058
245			_aMultiple occupation
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2001] 50 EG 89 (15/12/01)
520			_aCA 4 December 2001. "Reynolds v Brent LBC". Respondent R applied for registration of a house in multiple occupation, but appellant B refused, claiming that R was unfit to manage the house. R was told to appoint a suitable person to manage the property, then apply on his behalf. R appealed. Judge agreed R was unfit to manage the property, but B had not considered imposition of conditions in Housing Act 1985, 348(1)(d). R registered on judge's orders as long as he complied with all statutory requirements of Act. Appeal allowed.
650			_aMULTIPLE OCCUPATION
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985
650			_aENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990
650			_aLOCAL AUTHORITIES
650			_aREYNOLDS V BRENT LBC
690			_aHOUSING-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c69136 _d69136