000 01076cam a2200229 4500
001 WB3801-38
008 020109n2002 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u116192
245 _aBusiness tenancies
260 _c2002
490 _aEstates Gazette
_v[2002] 01 EG 73 (CS) (5/01/02)
520 _a"Hazel v Akhtar and another" CA 12 December 2001. Concerned claimant (A's) application for grant of a new tenancy, under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II, which had been rejected by landlords (B). Judge rejected A's application, finding them in breach of their repairing covenant and guilty of persistently failing to pay rent on time. A's appeal was allowed. The judge was found to be erring in law; his decision was unduly harsh.
590 _aWB
650 _aHAZEL V AKHTAR
650 _aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PT II
650 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30(1)
650 _aREPAIRING COVENANTS
650 _aRENT PAYMENTS
690 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942 _n0
999 _c69219
_d69219