000			01421cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS64867
008			020109n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116207
100			_aBingham, T.
245			_aYou'll pay for this
260			_c2001
490			_aBuilding _v(8214) 14 December 2001, 39(1)
520			_aConsiders two cases relating to adjudication. Argues that there are problems with the Construction Act 1996 as it does not provide for a statutory right for the adjudicator to hold on to his decision until his fee is paid. In Stubbs Rich Architects v WH Tolly & Son Ltd, the judge decided that a first court was wrong to compare work of a solicitor with that of an adjudicator. Further, in Paul Jenson v Straveley Industries PLC, Mr Jenson, the adjudicator sued the company that refused to pay his fees. The judge decided it was not the business of the court to decide whether an adjudicator was right or wrong.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aSTUBBS RICH ARCHITECTS V WH TOLLY & SON LTD
650			_aPAUL JENSON V STAVELEY
650			_aFEES REGULATION
650			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-LAW
942			_n0
999			_c69228 _d69228