000 01089cam a2200241 4500
001 ABS64928
008 020111n2001 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u116242
245 _aStay of proceedings: statutory demands
260 _c2001
490 _aArbitration Law Monthly
_v1(8) October 2001, 10-12(3)
520 _aConsiders a recent Australian case "Reinsurance Australian Corporation Ltd v Odyssey Re (Bermuda) Ltd" 2000 concerning whether a party who claims to be owed a sum of money can sidestep the obligation to arbitrate his claim by serving a statutory demand thereby initiating proceedings which can lead to the winding up of the debtor.
590 _aABS
650 _aSTATUTORY DEMAND
650 _aREINSUANCE AUSTRALIA CORPORATION LTD V ODYSSEY RE (BERMUDA) LTD
650 _aARIAS ARBITRATION RULES
650 _aDEBT
650 _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650 _aJURISDICTION
650 _aNEW YORK CONVENTION 1968
690 _aLAW-INTERNATIONAL
942 _n0
999 _c69258
_d69258