| 000 | 01594cam a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64938 | ||
| 008 | 020114n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116278 | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, M | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe right side of planning | |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0150) 15 December 2001, 85(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the planning system following the "Alconbury" decision. Acknowledges the importance of "Alconbury" which addressed the compatibility of the call-in decision-making process with the European Convention on Human Rights Article 6 requirement to a fair hearing, but suggests that "Alconbury" has its limitations and should not represent the final word. Discusses a number of recent planning cases and suggests that cumulatively they may have a significant influence over how human rights issues will mould the planning system. Case law. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 | ||
| 650 | _aALCONBURY | ||
| 650 | _aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6 | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING SYSTEM | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING INQUIRIES | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING APPLICATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aR V RHONDDA CYNON TAFF BC EX P KATHRO AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aFRIENDS PROVIDENT LIFE & PENSIONS LTD V SOS TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSOUTH BUCKS DC V PORTER | ||
| 650 | _aR V GLOUCESTER CITY COUNCIL EX P BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC AND ANOTHER | ||
| 690 |
_aPlanning and development _96259 |
||
| 700 | _aMartin, J | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69266 _d69266 |
||