| 000 | 01185cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65024 | ||
| 008 | 020123n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116416 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T | ||
| 245 | _aExpert witless | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8212) 30 November 2001, 50-51(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the role of the expert witness in a case between two architects, Gareth Pearce and Rem Koolhaas. Pearce accused Koolhaas of plagiarising his designs and engaged architect Mr Wilkey as his expert witness to explain the alleged copying. However, the case never came to trial because the evidence from the expert witness was deemed biased and irrational; Wilkey never visited the building in question and did not actually consider how an architect could have carried out the alleged copying. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 |
_aEXPERT WITNESS _96239 |
||
| 650 | _aARCHITECTS | ||
| 650 | _aBIAS | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN | ||
| 650 | _aARCHITECTURAL PLANS | ||
| 650 | _aPLAGIARISM | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-EXPERT WITNESSES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69342 _d69342 |
||