000			01514cam a2200241 4500
001			WB3804-11
008			020130n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116530
245			_aBusiness tenancy
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2002] 04 EG 174 (CS) (26 January 2002)
520			_aCA 17 January 2002. "Ambrose v Kaye". The appellant (A) held a business tenancy of premises. When the tenant's lease expired, the landlord (K) tried to terminate the tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II. A issued proceedings to apply for a new tenancy pursuant to s24(1) of the Act. The landlord opposed the application as he intended to occupy the premises himself. A preliminary hearing revealed the tenant A contended that K did not have a controlling interest in the company. K's wife transferred to him the majority of the shares in the company and K sought an adjournment to produce evidence of his controlling interest. The judge granted permission. At the later hearing, he found that K's objection to the grant of a new tenancy had been established. The tenant appealed. "Held", appeal dismissed.
590			_aWB
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aINTEREST
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S24(1)
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30(1)
650			_aRENEWAL OF LEASE
650			_aAMBROSE V KAYE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c69386 _d69386