000			01516cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS65030
008			020131n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116575
100			_aFranklin, K
245			_aSo who stands to benefit from adjudicator's nice little earner?
260			_c2002
490			_aArchitects' Journal _v215(1) 10 January 2002, 50(1)
520			_aDiscusses the payment of adjudicators, whether the company or the individual should be paid. Questions whether the person or the company is appointed when the appointment of an adjudicator is made and whether, if payment is withheld, the adjudicator sues in his own name or in the name of their company. Quotes the example of a recent case, "Faithful and Gould Ltd v Arcal Ltd and others". Concludes that adjudicators should ensure that they submit their own terms and conditions to the parties for agreement before agreeing to the appointment and to state who should be invoiced.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
650			_aLEGAL FEES
650			_aWITHHOLDING PAYMENT
650			_aPAYMENT
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-EXPERT WITNESSES
942			_n0
999			_c69418 _d69418