000			01782cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS65055
008			020206n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116613
245			_aSpeedwell Estates Ltd and another v Dalziel and others
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 02 EG 104-112(9)
520			_a"Speedwell Estates Ltd and another v Dalziel and others" CA, 31 July 2001, examined whether the failure to provide required particulars under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 sched 3 para 6 was an 'inaccuracy' not an invalidation of the notice of claim issued by each tenant (D). D had sought to acquire the freehold of their respective houses but the notices failed to contain particulars specified by the 1967 Act, including the dates of the respective leases, incorrect names of the parties, rateable values of the houses and no information regarding financial limits and the relevant valuation provision of the act. The landlords (S) contended that these invalidated the notices. The county court judge accepted the S's contentions and D appealed. CA dismissed the appeal; the failure to provide the correct details of the relevant leases or the details of the rateable values would not have invalidated the notices but the failure to provide details of the periods of residential occupation, the financial information and the relevant valuation provision did invalidate the notices.
590			_aABS
650			_aSPEEDWELL ESTATES LTD AND ANOTHER V DALZIEL AND OTHERS
650			_aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 SCHED 3
650			_aENFRANCHISEMENT NOTICE
650			_aNOTICE OF CLAIM
650			_aINVALID NOTICES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c69437 _d69437