| 000 | 00817cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3805-21 | ||
| 008 | 020206n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116634 | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA dodgy occupation | |
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0205) 2 February 2002, 128(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses recent CA decision "Lloyd and others v Dugdale and another" [2001] , which examined how proprietary estoppel could be used to overcome the absence of a lease agreement, but illustrates that such rights will not readily bind a successor in title, where the claimant is not in occupation. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aLLOYD AND OTHERS v DUGDALE AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aPROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPLETION | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69453 _d69453 |
||