| 000 | 01113cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65062 | ||
| 008 | 020207n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116642 | ||
| 100 | _aBlake, L. | ||
| 245 | _aFrom Poplar to Porter | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0202) 12 January 2002, 94-95(2) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the guilty verdict against Dame Shirley Porter for wilful misconduct in the historical context of challenges to local authority policies involving financial loss. British local government is based upon the 19th century model for municipal corporations and are open to any challenge that they have exceeded, or misused, their statutory powers. Also considers the case of Poplar LBC in 1920s where George Lansbury decided to pay a minimum wage well above other borough councils. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMAGILL V PORTER | ||
| 650 | _aROBERTS V HOPWOOD | ||
| 650 | _aLLOYD V MCMAHON | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL AUTHORITIES | ||
| 650 | _aWESTMINSTER CC | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE | ||
| 650 | _aLAW-UK | ||
| 690 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69461 _d69461 |
||