| 000 | 01368cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65020 | ||
| 008 | 020207n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116652 | ||
| 100 | _aBessey, J | ||
| 245 | _aAs you were | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v267(8216) 11 January 2002, 63(1) |
||
| 520 | _aArgues that judges should approach adjudicators' decision with caution when these decisions are challenged in the Court of Appeal. Refers to two cases, "C&B Scene Concept Design v Isobars" and VHE v RBSTB" where challenges were made to the adjudicator's jurisdiction. The issue raised in these cases was the failure to serve notices. Suggests that there is an inconsistency between adjudicators as to what the consequences of such a failure are and that this needs to be clarified, hopefully by the C&B case. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aC & B SCENE CONCEPT DESIGN LTD V ISOBARS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aVHE CONSTRUCTION PLC V RBSTB TRUST CO LTD | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS | ||
| 650 | _aJURISDICTION | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69470 _d69470 |
||