| 000 | 01418cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65021 | ||
| 008 | 020208n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116656 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T | ||
| 245 | _aGetting in early | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v267(8216) 11 January 2002, 62-63(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the new best practice guide into disputes over delay issued by the Society of Construction Law. The main aim of the protocol is to guide ordinary management into sorting out disputes caused by delay and disruption, explaining how a transparent and unified approach to programming through proper recording and identifying the consequences of the delay and disruption as normal management. Considers that the protocol is good in its explanation of terms used but disagrees with its approach to the global claim that these should be linked to resultant loss. Considers that global claims need more detailed analysis. The protocol can be downloaded for free from www.eotprotocol.com. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aPROTOCOLS | ||
| 650 | _aDELAYS | ||
| 650 | _aGLOBAL CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS | ||
| 650 | _aSOCIETY OF CONSTRUCTION LAW DELAY AND DISRUPTION PROTOCOL | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.eotprotocol.com _zView the proctocol on the Society of Construction Law website... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69472 _d69472 |
||