000			01558cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS65194
008			020225n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116831
100			_aMiller, R.
245			_aExclusion zone
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0205) 2 February 2002, 124-125(2)
520			_aDiscusses why the introduction of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not mean the end of the use of collateral warranties.The Act, the result of a House of Lords ruling following "Murphy V Brentwood DC "[1991], sought to ensure that all third parties with a present or future interest in a premises would have the same rights as the original developer to sue on the principal contract, so that all third parties would benefit equally. However, few major parties have wanted to depart from the previous use of warranties for various reasons, primarily because the new Act would not necessarily solve the limitations of warranties. Concludes that only an economic slowdown, leading to the need to save costs, will lead to funding institutions promoting the new Act.
590			_aABS
650			_aCONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999
650			_aMURPHY V BRENTWOOD DC
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS-CONSTRUCTION COLLATERAL WARRANTY FORMS
650			_aBUILDING DEFECTS
650			_aCONTRACT LAW
650			_aPROPERTY LAW
690			_aPROPERTY
700			_aCalderwood, L
942			_n0
999			_c69581 _d69581