| 000 | 01442cam a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65206 | ||
| 008 | 020226n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116846 | ||
| 100 | _aJohn, T. | ||
| 245 | _aVAT of the land | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v69(3) 25 January 2002, 34-35(2) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines recent rulings by European Court of Justice affecting many rules regarding Value Added Tax. Cites recent cases of Mirror Group and Cantor Fitzgerald versus Custom and Excise Commissioners where the ruling by UK courts of inducement as automatically subject to VAT was challenged. Inducement when paid by a landlord to a prospective tenant for the tenant to enter into a lease was ruled not to subject to VAT, whereas when paid by a tenant to a third party (assignee) to accept the assignment of a lease (a reverse assignment) was ruled to be subject to VAT, when these rulings were taken to the European Court. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aEUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE | ||
| 650 | _aHM CUSTOMS AND EXCISE | ||
| 650 | _aVALUE ADDED TAX | ||
| 650 | _aVALUE ADDED TAX | ||
| 650 | _aMIRROR GROUP PLC V CUSTOM AND EXCISE COMMISSIONERS | ||
| 650 | _aCANTOR FITZGERALD V CUSTOM AND EXCISE COMMISSIONERS | ||
| 650 | _aINDUCEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aREVERSE SURRENDERS | ||
| 650 | _aREVERSE ASSIGNMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aLEASE INDUCEMENTS | ||
| 690 | _aTAXATION | ||
| 700 | _aSteiner, P. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69589 _d69589 |
||