| 000 | 01202cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65081 | ||
| 008 | 020301n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116945 | ||
| 100 | _aMolloy, JB. | ||
| 245 | _aTime of the essence- a misunderstood term | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aSurveying News _v11(1) January 2002, 14-15(2) |
||
| 520 | _aArgues that this phrase is often misused in construction contracts, implying that if a building is not completed on time, then the employer does not want the building at all, and will treat the contract as repudiated. Such a case would be very rare. Probably what is really wanted is the contractor to try to finish on time, avoiding extensions of time and liquidated damages. An alternative course would be for an employer to serve a notice requiring completion by a certain date. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLUCAS V GODWIN | ||
| 650 | _aLAMPRELL V BILLERICAY UNION | ||
| 650 | _aPEAK CONSTRUCTION LIVERPOOL LTD V MCKINNEY FOUNDATIONS LTD | ||
| 650 |
_aContracts _96232 |
||
| 650 | _aCOMPLETION | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSION OF TIME | ||
| 650 | _aLIQUIDATED DAMAGES | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69652 _d69652 |
||