000			01058cam a2200193 4500
001			X116949
008			020301n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116949
245			_aFranks and another v Towse
260			_c2002
490			_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v[2002} RVR 15(1)
520			_aCA 15 January 2001. Application by tenant (T) against a LT decision determining the premium to be paid for the grant of a new extended lease under the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s48. Held that the LT correctly rejected the evidence of an expert witness who by leave of the LT was also acting as an advocate on the grounds that he had put forward his opinion not in his role of expert witness but as an advocate for the respondent, his daughter. Permission to appeal refused.
650			_aFRANKS AND TOWSE
650			_aEXPERT WITNESS _96239
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S48
650			_aEVIDENCE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c69656 _d69656