| 000 | 01235cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65168 | ||
| 008 | 020304n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116958 | ||
| 245 | _aBurman v Mount Cook Land Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 06 EG 156-163(8) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 20 November 2001. Tenant (B) issued a notice on 9 October 1999 claiming a new lease under Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s42, proposing a premium of £110 000. Landlord(M) issued a counternotice proposing a premium of £175 000. B appealed against the CC's decision, which dismissed his claim that M's counternotice was invalid, as it had failed to admit B's claim to a new lease, as required by s45(2)(a) of 1993 Act. CA held that counternotice was invalid, overturning CC's ruling. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBURMAN V MOUNT COOK LAND LTD | ||
| 650 | _aNEW LEASE | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S42 | ||
| 650 | _aPREMIUMS | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S45 | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69663 _d69663 |
||