000			01357cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS65163
008			020304n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116968
245			_aHazel v Akhtar and another
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 07 EG 124-130(7)
520			_aCA 12 December 2001. Appellant tenant H appealed against CC decision refusing to grant him a business tenancy on the grounds that he had been persistently late in paying his rent and had been in breach of his repairing obligations. On expiry of H's lease in July 2002, landlord A served a s25 notice opposing the granting of a new lease under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(a) and (b). CA noted that the CC judge had omitted to take into account that the late payment of rent had been acceptable to the previous landlord and that the present landlords at is assignees were estopped from insisting that H should revert to strict compliance of the rent unless reasonable notice had been give to H to that effect. H's appeal allowed. New tenancy granted.
590			_aABS
650			_aHAZEL V AKHTAR
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30(1)
650			_aREPAIRING COVENANTS
650			_aRENT REPAYMENT
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c69673 _d69673