000			01309cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS65185
008			020305n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116974
100			_aEdwards, M.
245			_aWhen brown is green
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v (0208) 23 February 2002, 158(1)
520			_aHighlights a recent case "Dodd v SoS Environment" [2002] which dealt with the redevelopment of brownfield land. Case concluded that permission to develop on brownfield land may be refused where the land falls outside the definition of 'previously developed land' contained in PPG 3. The claimants appeal to have decision to refuse planning permission reversed was refused. Decision hinged on whether the remains of a previous structure on the site had blended into the landscape. Could be interpreted by landowners that in order to prevent remains blending into the landscape, they could decide not to demolish remains of existing structures or prevent growth of vegetation, so that land can be redeveloped. However, this could lead to many sites becoming eyesores.
590			_aABS
650			_aBROWNFIELD LAND
650			_aDODD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
650			_aREDEVELOPMENT
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
700			_aMartin, M.
942			_n0
999			_c69677 _d69677