| 000 | 01128cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65169 | ||
| 008 | 020305n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u116976 | ||
| 100 | _aRutler, J. | ||
| 245 | _aTraps of offer-backs | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v67(7) 22 February 2002, 38-39(2) |
||
| 520 | _aUsing recent case "Bircham & Co Nominees (No 2) Ltd and Sarah Stowell v Worrell Holdings Ltd", warns landlords of losing their rights of pre-emption. A landlord thought he was accepting an offer-back, but lost his rights on a technicality, concerning the date of acceptance on an offer-back. Offer-backs are generally used so that a landlord can block the transfer of a lease to a tenants' chosen assignee. Suggests landlords remember that a conditional acceptance is not an acceptance at all. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989 | ||
| 650 | _aOFFER BACK CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aPRE-EMPTION | ||
| 650 | _aBIRCHAM AND CO NOMINEES (NO 2) LTD AND ANOTHER V WORRELL HOLDINGS LTD | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69679 _d69679 |
||