| 000 | 00962cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2515-31 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u10939 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSurveyor wins negligence case | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aIndependent _v14/4/89 p14 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Eley and Another v King & Chasemore (a firm), CA 11 April 1989, it was held that a surveyor , who carried out a structural survey on a house and advised the purchasers (E) to insure against subsidence , was not guilty of negligence for failing to advise E that the house needed underpinning . The surveyor was also held to be not negligent for failing to go on the roof when there were no signs of water penetration. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING DEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aCRACKS | ||
| 650 | _aGROUND HEAVE | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aSETTLEMENT | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c6968 _d6968 |
||